华裔议员董晗鹏向Global News(《环球新闻》)发出起诉书
今天,Polley Faith LLP代表国会议员董晗鹏向Global News、Corus Entertainment Inc.、Sam Cooper、Sonia Verma 等发出起诉书,要求 1500 万加元的诽谤赔偿。被告在2023年2⽉和2023年3⽉发表了针对董先⽣的恶意、虚假和诽谤性文章和报道,破坏了他来之不易的声誉和事业,并使他和他的家⼈⾯临仇恨⾔论和威胁。
被告所报道的对董先⽣的严重指控包括试图颠覆加拿⼤的民主进程、充当外国特⼯和叛徒等,因此被告有责任在发布前彻底审查匿名消息来源的真实性。他们还有责任报道与其线报提供指控不⼀致之处或存疑之处。
— 广告 —
— 大洋海产 加拿大的急冻海鲜先锋 —
被告在诸多方⾯并未能履⾏这些义务(详见起诉书)。至关重要的是,被告没有查询2021年2⽉谈话的文字记录或录音,他们声称董先生在谈话中呼吁继续监禁Michael Kovrig和Michael Spavor。被告也没有报道关键的背景信息,包括:
- 董先⽣在遵守严格的选举财务法规的前提下,艰难赢得了2019年自由党提名;
- 作为竞选的惯常做法,董先生的竞选团队为住在他选区的⽼年人提供交通服务,以便让他们投票;
- 作为民选官员的惯常做法,董先生在⼯作中偶尔会与外交官交谈,包括以加中立法协会联合主席的身份;
- 据《环球邮报》报道,总理办公室在董先生2021年2⽉与中国驻多伦多总领事的谈话记录中没有发现“需采取行动的证据”;
- 高级政府官员在证词中明确反驳并澄清了中国干涉指控的关键问题。
与被告的指控相反,董先⽣抓住每次与中国外交官交谈的机会,多次主张释放 Michael Kovrig与Michael Spavor。
在发出书面撤销要求后,董先生对被告提起了这⼀诉讼,以恢复他的名誉和职业生涯,并保护他⾃⼰和他的家⼈免受进⼀步伤害。
Because of the serious allegations against Mr. Dong reported by the defendants—which include claims that he attempted to subvert Canada’s democratic processes, acted as a foreign agent, and is a traitor—the defendants had a duty to thoroughly scrutinize the veracity of their anonymous sources’ allegations before publication. They also had a duty to report information that was inconsistent with or raised questions about their sources’ allegations.
- Mr. Dong won his 2019 Liberal Party nomination in a hard-fought contest, complying with strict election finance laws;
- As is common practice amongst politicians running for office, Mr. Dong’s campaign provided transportation to seniors living within his riding to allow them to vote;
- As is common practice for elected officials, Mr. Dong occasionally spoke with diplomats as part of his work, including in his capacity as co-chair of the Canada-China Legislative Association;
- As reported by the Globe and Mail, the Prime Minister’s Office found no “actionable evidence” in the transcript of Mr. Dong’s February 2021 conversation with the Chinese Consul General in Toronto; and
- Senior government officials have explicitly contradicted and clarified key aspects of the Chinese interference allegations in testimony.